Cetaphil “Bonus Size” Containers
June 2017: This action was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. The named plaintiff’s claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot…
March 2017: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
September 2016: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Galderma Laboratories in September 2016 (and transferred to federal court in October 2016) for allegedly misleadingly representing that Cetaphil® skin care products treat or mitigate eczema when, in reality, they do not. (Greenberg et al v. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. and Does 1-100, Case No. 16-cv-6090, N. D. CA.)
Pete Davidson is in a hairy situation.
Unauthorized health claims come down in wake of FDA warning letter.
SAT test prep company comes clean about its money-back guarantee.
Illegal claims that company’s products prevent hair loss also need to go.
MADISON, CONN. December 1, 2022 – Acting on a complaint filed by ad watchdog, truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org), California regulators have reached a settlement with lingerie company Savage X Fenty, originally a joint venture between…