Cetaphil “Bonus Size” Containers
June 2017: This action was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. The named plaintiff’s claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot…
Cetaphil® Skin Care Products
March 2017: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
September 2016: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Galderma Laboratories in September 2016 (and transferred to federal court in October 2016) for allegedly misleadingly representing that Cetaphil® skin care products treat or mitigate eczema when, in reality, they do not. (Greenberg et al v. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. and Does 1-100, Case No. 16-cv-6090, N. D. CA.)
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
AT&T’s Connectivity Guarantee
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
CATrends: Packed in ‘100% Fruit Juice’
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
Little Ceaser’s Crazy Puffs
No eyebrows were harmed in the making of this Crazy Puffs commercial
A $49.95 Any Sewer or Drain
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
What You Should Know about LED Face Masks
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.