Starkist Tuna’s Dolphin Safe Representations
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “Dolphin Safe”
Cans of Starkist Tuna
April 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
September 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Starkist Co. alleging that cans of Starkist tuna do not contain the amount of tuna represented on the label and contain less tuna than the minimum amount required by federal regulations. (Puckett et al v. Starkist Co., Case No. 17-cv-1416, D. Ore.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuit regarding tuna products and TINA.org’s coverage of the products, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
StarKist Tuna
The Heart-Check Mark on Starkist Tuna
The Latest
By the Numbers: Greenwashing Class-Action Lawsuits
TINA.org has tracked more than 150 lawsuits alleging greenwashing.
StarKist Tuna’s ‘Dolphin Safe’ Claims
Lawsuit alleges company’s tuna fishing methods kill dolphins, despite a “dolphin safe” logo on the can.
CATrends: ‘Dolphin Safe’ Tuna
Lawsuits accuse country’s three largest tuna producers of using fishing techniques that hurt and kill dolphins.
Heart-Healthy Certification: The Price is the Right
And it’s a hearty fee that food manufacturers pay for the right to display the AHA’s heart-check mark.
The Heart-Check Mark on StarKist Products
Paid endorsement? Check.