
1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Hill et al v. Canidae Corp.
20-cv-1374, C.D. Cal.
(July 2020)
Canidae Pure limited ingredient pet foods
Misrepresenting that pet foods contain only specified ingredients when the products contain significant amounts of ingredients that are not listed on the labels
Settled
(Preliminarily approved)
http://www.petfoodingredientsettlement.com/
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.