There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In June 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Britax Child Safety, Inc. for allegedly deceptively marketing several models of its BOB strollers with a large front wheel – including the IRONMAN, Revolution, and Sport Utility Stroller D’Lux – as being high-quality, safe, reliable, and suitable for use while jogging and in rough terrain when, according to plaintiffs, the front wheel may detach unexpectedly due to a defect and cause injuries to people pushing the strollers and children riding in the strollers. (Perez et al v. Britax Child Safety, Inc., Case No. 19-cv-1735, D. SC.)
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.