
Babyganics SPF 50+ Sunscreens
December 2017: This case was stayed pending a nationwide settlement in a related case, Mayhew v. KAS Direct and S. C. Johnson & Son.
October 2017: The claims against VMG Partners were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. The claims against S. C. Johnson & Son remain pending.
August 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against S. C. Johnson & Son and VMG Partners for allegedly falsely advertising babyganics mineral-based sunscreens as being SPF 50+ when, according to plaintiffs, the SPF of the sunscreens is no more than, and sometimes much lower than, SPF 30. (Carroll et al v. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. and VMG Partners, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-5828, N.D. Ill.)
For more information about TINA.org’s coverage of the marketing of sunscreens, click here.
Class-Action Tracker


Babyganics Bath Products

Babyganics Pre-Moistened Wipes
The Latest

Sidebar: Love is a lie
Courthouse News Service

Brillia
What consumers should know about this purported homeopathic product.

Yu
Supplement company removes some unapproved health claims following TINA.org inquiry.

PurelyWhite Deluxe Teeth Whitening Kit
Shining a bright light on this company’s marketing claims.

CATrends: Dating Apps’ Alleged Unlawful Storage of Biometric Information
Is your selfie safe?