Class Action

Babyganics SPF 50+ Sunscreens

Class Action

Babyganics SPF 50+ Sunscreens

December 2017: This case was stayed pending a nationwide settlement in a related case, Mayhew v. KAS Direct and S. C. Johnson & Son.

October 2017: The claims against VMG Partners were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. The claims against S. C. Johnson & Son remain pending.

August 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against S. C. Johnson & Son and VMG Partners for allegedly falsely advertising babyganics mineral-based sunscreens as being SPF 50+ when, according to plaintiffs, the SPF of the sunscreens is no more than, and sometimes much lower than, SPF 30. (Carroll et al v. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. and VMG Partners, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-5828, N.D. Ill.)

For more information about TINA.org’s coverage of the marketing of sunscreens, click here.


Class-Action Tracker


The Latest

Filters

Brillia

Ad Alert

Brillia

What consumers should know about this purported homeopathic product.

Yu

Ad Alert

Yu

Supplement company removes some unapproved health claims following TINA.org inquiry.


Show More