AZEK PVC Synthetic Decking
January 2018: Plaintiffs moved for final approval of the settlement agreement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for March 13, 2018.
August 2017: A federal judge granted preliminary approval of a settlement agreement. According to the settlement terms, claimants may receive one refund for 10% of the price they paid for a maximum award of $2,000.
April 2014: A Consolidated Amended Complaint regarding the marketing for AZEK decking was filed after similar cases were transferred to one court to be heard together. The complaint, which was amended in January 2016, alleges that the AZEK Building Products marketed a synthetic decking made of polyvinylchloride (PVC) as durable and resistant to staining, fading, mold, water, and scratches when, according to plaintiffs, the decking prematurely discolored, faded, and deteriorated. Plaintiffs also claim that the decking requires significantly more maintenance than represented. (In Re AZEK Decking Sales Practices Litigation, Case No. 12-cv-6627, D.N.J.; MDL No. 2506)
Class-Action Tracker
AZEK Decking
The Latest
Ocean Spray Cranberry Juice Blend
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Lens.com
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
On Shoes
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Junk Fees at JFK, LaGuardia and Newark Airports
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?
FTC Takes TruHeight’s Growth Claims Down a Few Pegs
Supplement maker agrees to pay $750K to settle deceptive health claims lawsuit.