
AZEK Decking and Railing Products
February 2014: This case was transferred to a court in New Jersey to be heard with other similar cases. To learn more about the multidistrict litigation (MDL), click here. April…
January 2018: Plaintiffs moved for final approval of the settlement agreement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for March 13, 2018.
August 2017: A federal judge granted preliminary approval of a settlement agreement. According to the settlement terms, claimants may receive one refund for 10% of the price they paid for a maximum award of $2,000.
April 2014: A Consolidated Amended Complaint regarding the marketing for AZEK decking was filed after similar cases were transferred to one court to be heard together. The complaint, which was amended in January 2016, alleges that the AZEK Building Products marketed a synthetic decking made of polyvinylchloride (PVC) as durable and resistant to staining, fading, mold, water, and scratches when, according to plaintiffs, the decking prematurely discolored, faded, and deteriorated. Plaintiffs also claim that the decking requires significantly more maintenance than represented. (In Re AZEK Decking Sales Practices Litigation, Case No. 12-cv-6627, D.N.J.; MDL No. 2506)
February 2014: This case was transferred to a court in New Jersey to be heard with other similar cases. To learn more about the multidistrict litigation (MDL), click here. April…
February/March 2014: This case was transferred to a court in New Jersey to be heard with other similar cases. To learn more about the multidistrict litigation (MDL), click here. January…
This risk-free trial might have you pulling your hair out.
Proposed new earnings claim rule comes three years after TINA.org comment to FTC.
How negative feelings surrounding menstruation have influenced period product marketing.
Why these products may leave you wanting more.
Class-action lawsuits target preservative-free claims.