AZEK PVC Synthetic Decking
January 2018: Plaintiffs moved for final approval of the settlement agreement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for March 13, 2018.
August 2017: A federal judge granted preliminary approval of a settlement agreement. According to the settlement terms, claimants may receive one refund for 10% of the price they paid for a maximum award of $2,000.
April 2014: A Consolidated Amended Complaint regarding the marketing for AZEK decking was filed after similar cases were transferred to one court to be heard together. The complaint, which was amended in January 2016, alleges that the AZEK Building Products marketed a synthetic decking made of polyvinylchloride (PVC) as durable and resistant to staining, fading, mold, water, and scratches when, according to plaintiffs, the decking prematurely discolored, faded, and deteriorated. Plaintiffs also claim that the decking requires significantly more maintenance than represented. (In Re AZEK Decking Sales Practices Litigation, Case No. 12-cv-6627, D.N.J.; MDL No. 2506)
Class-Action Tracker
AZEK Decking
The Latest
Can You Tell Me How to Pay at Sesame Place?
Theme park fails to adequately disclose that it’s a “cashless” operation.
Did Timothée Chalamet Just Take a Dig at Deceptive Marketing?
Why I’m a fan of this Adidas World Cup ad.
‘Bet Now’: How Wagering Apps’ Push Notification Ads Bombard Consumers
TINA.org joins petition urging FTC to require consent and opt-out for gambling marketing.
Does Gatorade ‘Hydrate Better than Water’?
Lawsuits takes aim at sports drinks’ superior hydration claim.
Phoebe Gates’s Startup Phia Was Just Accused of ‘Cookie Stuffing.’ Here’s What Happens Next
Esther Lian, Inc.com