AZEK PVC Synthetic Decking
January 2018: Plaintiffs moved for final approval of the settlement agreement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for March 13, 2018.
August 2017: A federal judge granted preliminary approval of a settlement agreement. According to the settlement terms, claimants may receive one refund for 10% of the price they paid for a maximum award of $2,000.
April 2014: A Consolidated Amended Complaint regarding the marketing for AZEK decking was filed after similar cases were transferred to one court to be heard together. The complaint, which was amended in January 2016, alleges that the AZEK Building Products marketed a synthetic decking made of polyvinylchloride (PVC) as durable and resistant to staining, fading, mold, water, and scratches when, according to plaintiffs, the decking prematurely discolored, faded, and deteriorated. Plaintiffs also claim that the decking requires significantly more maintenance than represented. (In Re AZEK Decking Sales Practices Litigation, Case No. 12-cv-6627, D.N.J.; MDL No. 2506)
Class-Action Tracker
AZEK Decking
The Latest
TINA.org Action Sheds Light on SunPowerLED’s False Endorsement Claims
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
VIN History USA’s ‘Free’ VIN Report
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
Will the MLM Industry Fix Its Earnings Claims Problem?
New research points to “no.”
TINA.org Supports Citizen Petition Calling for AI Pricing Transparency
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.
James ‘Jay’ Noland’s Latest Ventures Raise Familiar Concerns
Permanently banned from MLM, Noland has found other ways to exploit consumers.