Axe Antiperspirants
Case Name (Date)
Muller et al v. Conopco, Inc. d/b/a Unilever
21-cv-583, E.D. Mo.
(Jan. 2021)
Product/Service
Axe antiperspirants
Allegations
Deceptively marketing that products provide “Anti Marks Protection” when the active ingredient actually causes white marks and yellow stains
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Axe Anti-Marks Antiperspirants
The Latest
TINA.org Supports FTC’s ‘Click to Cancel’ Rule against Industry Challenge
Companies should not be able to trap consumers into subscriptions that they do not want.
Consumers Throw Flags on Super Bowl Advertisers
Six big game marketers that have been accused of fumbling ad claims.
Most Deceptive Ads of 2023
Some of the worst ads TINA.org covered this year.
Hair-Raising Claims by Unilever’s Nutrafol Reported to Regulators
TINA.org files complaint with the FDA and FTC over company’s hair growth claims.
Consumer Alert: Hair Growth Products
Supplement and serum companies are targeting consumers experiencing hair loss.