
These Super Bowl LVIII Advertisers Have Been Taken to Court for Deceptive Marketing
Several of this year’s Super Bowl advertisers have run into legal trouble for alleged deceptive marketing.
Sloan et al. v. Anker Technology Corp. and Fantasia Trading LLC
22-cv-7174, N.D. Ill.
(Dec. 2022)
Anker Innovations and eufy security cameras, including eufycam, Video Smart Lock, SoloCam, Floodlight Cam, Video Doorbell, and Solo Indoorcam
Falsely marketing that footage recorded by security cameras “will be kept private,” “[s]tored locally” and encrypted when data was moved to a cloud server, shared between accounts, and not encrypted
Pending
Several of this year’s Super Bowl advertisers have run into legal trouble for alleged deceptive marketing.
Consumer complaints regarding alleged surprise charges are piling up.
Holy crop.
It’s not the first time the company has been accused of pulling a bait and switch.
Company makes marketing changes following TINA.org inquiry.