
CATrends: Deceptive Influencer Marketing
It’s a hot sponcon summer.
September 2020: The case was dismissed after the Court granted a motion to compel arbitration.
July 2020: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 20-cv-1456, S.D. Cal.)
June 2020: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Ancestry.com alleging that it misleadingly offers a free trial to access genealogical records without adequately disclosing that consumers who sign up for the free trial will be automatically enrolled in a monthly subscription resulting in consumers being charged without their consent. (Chapple et al v. Ancestry.com Operations Inc., Case No. 37-2020-00021807, California State Court – San Diego)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of negative option offers, click here.
It’s a hot sponcon summer.
Ad Council’s new campaign in Illinois describes Firearm Restraining Orders which temporarily prevent someone in crisis from purchasing or possessing firearms.
What’s this reservation good for?
TINA.org continues to support FTC, New York in federal court.
A bogus connection to major retailers is just the beginning.