Amy’s Kitchen Food
October 2016: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
September 2014: A false advertising class-action lawsuit filed against Amy’s Kitchen was transferred from the Northern District of Illinois to Northern District of California. The complaint, which was originally filed in Illinois state court in 2013, alleges that the company mislabels products – including its Asian Noodle Stir-Fry, Roasted Vegetable Lasagna, and Baked Ziti Bowl – as containing “evaporated cane juice” when, according to plaintiffs, they contain sugar. (Gilbert et al v. Amy’s Kitchen, Inc., Case No. 14-cv-04380, N.D. Cal.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits against Amy’s Kitchen and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
For more information about sugar, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Amy’s Kitchen
The Latest
Fixing the Subscription Trap
The FTC’s Negative Option Rule do-over – and what’s at stake.
A Brand Story
Be wary of questionable and deceptive claims in origin stories.
Meta AI Smart Glasses
Mounting lawsuits accuse Meta of breaking privacy promises.
Pizza Hut’s $10 Large Pizza
Breaking down the fine print of this March Madness commercial.
Buffalo Wild Wings’ Pick 6 Meal for Two
Advertised $19.99 price deserves an official review.