Domino’s Free Emergency Pizza
Getting a slice of this complimentary pie may be harder than you think.
Alterna Caviar Anti-Aging Shampoo
In December 2013, a federal judge transferred a class-action lawsuit against Alterna Holdings Corp from federal court back to state court because the company did not establish that the amount in controversy was more than $5,000, as required to have the case in a federal court. The complaint, which was originally filed in state court in 2013, alleges that the company advertises Alterna Caviar Anti-Aging Shampoo as providing “anti-aging” benefits – such as restoring and rebalancing moisture and revitalizing brittle hair – when, in reality, the shampoo does not work as advertised. (Kenney et al v. Alterna Holdings Corp., et al, Case No. 13-cv-09014, C. D. CA.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding shampoo and TINA.org’s coverage of the product, click here.
The Latest
How Investing in the Cutting Edge Can Bleed You Dry
What consumers should know about software tethering.
Subway’s Steak and Cheese Sandwiches
Chain faces lawsuit over meat filling representations.
The Growing AI Conundrum: Fake Reviews Edition
TINA.org supports consolidated FTC efforts to attack burgeoning issue.
Balance of Nature’ ‘Fruits’ and ‘Veggies’ Supplements
Supplement company stumbles over discount offer.