
Apple Intelligence Lawsuits Mounting
Apple iPhone 16 users are asking Siri, where are the AI features that were touted in ads?
In December 2013, a federal judge transferred a class-action lawsuit against Alterna Holdings Corp from federal court back to state court because the company did not establish that the amount in controversy was more than $5,000, as required to have the case in a federal court. The complaint, which was originally filed in state court in 2013, alleges that the company advertises Alterna Caviar Anti-Aging Shampoo as providing “anti-aging” benefits – such as restoring and rebalancing moisture and revitalizing brittle hair – when, in reality, the shampoo does not work as advertised. (Kenney et al v. Alterna Holdings Corp., et al, Case No. 13-cv-09014, C. D. CA.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding shampoo and TINA.org’s coverage of the product, click here.
Apple iPhone 16 users are asking Siri, where are the AI features that were touted in ads?
Get the dirt on this company’s “risk-free” trial.
TINA.org sheds light on medical device company’s marketing claims.
TINA.org uncovers questionable roots behind this “free” offer.
These claims to detect intolerances to more than 200 foods are tough to stomach.