Wilson’s Made in USA Claims
Flag on the play.
Alterna Caviar Anti-Aging Shampoo
In December 2013, a federal judge transferred a class-action lawsuit against Alterna Holdings Corp from federal court back to state court because the company did not establish that the amount in controversy was more than $5,000, as required to have the case in a federal court. The complaint, which was originally filed in state court in 2013, alleges that the company advertises Alterna Caviar Anti-Aging Shampoo as providing “anti-aging” benefits – such as restoring and rebalancing moisture and revitalizing brittle hair – when, in reality, the shampoo does not work as advertised. (Kenney et al v. Alterna Holdings Corp., et al, Case No. 13-cv-09014, C. D. CA.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding shampoo and TINA.org’s coverage of the product, click here.
The Latest
Cow Colostrum Supplements
What you need to know about what some are calling “liquid gold.”
Polaris Advertising
TINA.org investigates where these clickbait emails are actually coming from.
Welcome Aboard the Hungry Skies Presented by SNICKERS
SNICKERS is coming to the rescue for all flight attendants and passengers who need help 36K feet in the air.
Kettle ‘Air Fried’ Potato Chips
Lawsuit alleges Kettle is cooking up something deceptive with its “air fried” claims.