Carvana’s ‘7-Day Money-Back Guarantee’
Is it still a money-back guarantee if you end up paying hundreds of dollars?
Alterna Caviar Anti-Aging Shampoo
In December 2013, a federal judge transferred a class-action lawsuit against Alterna Holdings Corp from federal court back to state court because the company did not establish that the amount in controversy was more than $5,000, as required to have the case in a federal court. The complaint, which was originally filed in state court in 2013, alleges that the company advertises Alterna Caviar Anti-Aging Shampoo as providing “anti-aging” benefits – such as restoring and rebalancing moisture and revitalizing brittle hair – when, in reality, the shampoo does not work as advertised. (Kenney et al v. Alterna Holdings Corp., et al, Case No. 13-cv-09014, C. D. CA.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding shampoo and TINA.org’s coverage of the product, click here.
The Latest
CATrends: Nutriwashing
Lawsuits allege foods and beverages aren’t as healthy as you might think.
U-Haul Uses ‘Bait-and-Switch’ Advertising, According to Investigation by Watchdog Group
Herb Weisbaum, The ConsumerMan, Consumers’ Checkbook
iFLO AC Cleaner
Is this device maker blowing hot air when it comes to its clog-free claims?
Splash Refresher Sparkling Water
Products contain some surprising ingredients for a drink advertised as “like water.”