
Aveeno Makeup Removing Wipes
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as 100% plant-based when they contain synthetic, non-plant ingredients
September 2014: Plaintiffs withdrew their motion to transfer and consolidate related lawsuits.
June 2014: Plaintiffs moved to transfer (i. e. move a case to another court) and consolidate (i. e. hear several proceedings together) related lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson. According to the complaints, the company misleadingly markets “Active Naturals” Aveeno products by marketing and labeling the products as “natural” when they actually contain synthetic ingredients. (In Re: Johnson & Johnson Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, MDL No. 2565, U. S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as 100% plant-based when they contain synthetic, non-plant ingredients
Allegations: Failing to disclose products contain the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as specially made for babies when they contain the same formulation as the adult versions
Allegations: Failing to disclose sunscreens contain the carcinogen benzene
A deceptive marketing trend takes root.
How negative feelings surrounding menstruation have influenced period product marketing.
Class-action lawsuits target preservative-free claims.
Some class-action settlements that left consumers behind.
Lawsuit alleges environmental claims don’t stick.