There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Edwards et al. v. 1st Source Bank
24-cv-10690, D. Mass.
(July 2023)
Funk et al. v. 1st Source Corp. et al.
24-cv-10689, D. Mass.
(July 2023)
Kuhn et al. v. 1st Source Bank
23-cv-702, N.D. Ind.
(July 2023)
Montgomery et al. v. 1st Source Bank
24-cv-10694, D. Mass.
(July 2023)
Tompach et al. v. 1st Source Corp. et al.
24-cv-10693, D. Mass.
(July 2023)
1st Source Bank
Misrepresenting that it protects consumers’ personal information when it failed to do so and there was a data breach in 2023
Transferred to In Re: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation (MDL No. 3083)
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.