Premium Select Medium Red Smoked Salmon Filets in Oil
Allegations: Deceptively marketing products as being high-quality, wild-caught, and smoked
November 2021: The case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled..
June 2019: Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint.
May 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Bumble Bee Foods for allegedly misleadingly marketing Bumble Bee tuna products as being “Dolphin Safe” and produced using sustainable fishing practices when, according to plaintiffs, dolphins and other marine life are killed or injured by the fishing methods used to catch the tuna in the products. The complaint also claims that the company’s representation that it is a member of the International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF) is misleading because ISSF, which was created and is funded by Bumble Bee and other big tuna companies, is not independent or impartial and the organization does not support banning or controlling unsustainable fishing techniques. (Duggan et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, Case No. 19-cv-2564, N.D. Cal.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of the marketing of tuna products, click here.
Allegations: Deceptively marketing products as being high-quality, wild-caught, and smoked
Allegations: Falsely marketing seafoods as sustainable
TINA.org has tracked more than 100 lawsuits alleging greenwashing.
Lawsuit alleges company’s tuna fishing methods kill dolphins, despite a “dolphin safe” logo on the can.
Lawsuits accuse country’s three largest tuna producers of using fishing techniques that hurt and kill dolphins.
“Non-GMO”: Not to be confused with GMO-free.
And it’s a hearty fee that food manufacturers pay for the right to display the AHA’s heart-check mark.