FTC Algorithmic Pricing Comments
TINA.org joined a coalition of consumer law advocates and consumer groups in submitting comments to the FTC regarding the use of personalized algorithmic pricing.
Timeline
2026
September 25
TINA.org and a coalition of 26 other consumer and public interest groups and several law school consumer justice organizations submit a comment to the FTC on its proposed enforcement policy statement on personalized pricing.
August 19
The FTC votes 2-0 to publish a proposed enforcement policy statement on personalized pricing for public comment. The proposed statement states, among other things, that consumers reasonably expect a listed price to be the same for everyone, and warns that representing prices as static or widely offered when they actually vary by individual, or using consumers’ personal data to set prices without disclosing it, may violate Section 5 of the FTC Act.
February 23
TINA.org and a coalition of several other consumer and public interest groups, including the National Consumers League, National Consumer Law Center, Consumer Federation of America, and several law school consumer justice organizations, submit a comment to the FTC in support of the petition for rulemaking regarding disclosures when personalized algorithmic pricing is at play.
2025
November 28
Citizen files a petition for rulemaking with the FTC regarding deceptive pricing architecture and algorithmic market manipulation.
Featured
With Personalized Pricing, Disclosure Is a Start, But Not a Finish Line
TINA.org and other consumer advocates file comment with FTC.
TINA.org Supports Citizen Petition Calling for AI Pricing Transparency
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.