Sirius XM Music Plans
Allegations: Failing to include its “U.S. Music Royalty Fee” in advertised prices
July 2020: A federal judge preliminarily approved the settlement agreement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for January 25, 2021. For more information, go to https://www.lifetimesiriusxmsettlement.com/.
June 2020: Plaintiffs filed an Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint and moved for preliminary approval of a proposed settlement agreement. According to the settlement terms, class members with active lifetime subscriptions may transfer Sirius XM to another device an unlimited number of times for a $35 fee while class members with inactive lifetime subscriptions may reactivate their subscription or receive $100 for each inactive subscription. The agreement would also make the Sirius XM internet streaming service available to class members who reactivate their inactive subscriptions.
October 2018: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 18-cv-8605, C.D. Cal.)
August 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Sirius XM Radio for allegedly deceptively advertising that lifetime subscriptions last for the lifetime of the purchaser when, according to the complaint, the subscriptions actually last for the lifetime of the purchaser’s radio receiver or vehicle. (Alvarez et al v. Sirius XM Radio Inc., Case No. BC719411, California State Court – Los Angeles)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of Sirius XM Radio, click here.
Allegations: Failing to include its “U.S. Music Royalty Fee” in advertised prices
June 2020: This case was voluntarily dismissed and the named plaintiff entered a settlement agreement that was reached in a related case, Alvarez v. Sirius XM Radio. 2018: A false…
2020: The named plaintiff in this case entered into a settlement agreement that was reached in a related case, Alvarez v. Sirius XM Radio. December 2018: The appeal was voluntarily…
October 2019: This case was remanded back to New Jersey state court. July 2019: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 19-cv-15778, D.N.J.) June 2019: A class-action lawsuit…
Internet radio giant settles claims it billed consumers without their consent.