Fairlife Milk
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Antolini et al. v. ZORBX Inc. et al.
21-cv-11081, S.D.N.Y.
(Dec. 2021)
ZORBX household cleaners
Falsely marketing products as being “non-toxic,” “free of harsh chemicals,” and “safe for people, pets, & the planet” when ingredients in them harm people, animals, and the environment
Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.