On Shoes
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
In May 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Wright-Patt Credit Union for allegedly misleadingly representing that consumers will only be charged one non-sufficient fund fee on a single transaction when, according to plaintiffs, the credit union regularly charges multiple non-sufficient funds fees on a single transaction. The complaint also claims that the credit union fails to adequately disclose that there are situations when a consumer will be charged multiple out-of-network fees for a single transaction on an ATM that is not a Wright-Patt Credit Union ATM. (Qualls et al v. Wright-Patt Credit Union, Inc., Case No. 19-cv-1965, S. D. OH.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of banks, click here.
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?
Supplement maker agrees to pay $750K to settle deceptive health claims lawsuit.
Every now and then you overthink.
Settlement comes after TINA.org exposed thousands of deceptive income claims.