Season’s Groomings | Manscaped
Pete Davidson is in a hairy situation.
Wright-Patt Credit Union’s Fees
In May 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Wright-Patt Credit Union for allegedly misleadingly representing that consumers will only be charged one non-sufficient fund fee on a single transaction when, according to plaintiffs, the credit union regularly charges multiple non-sufficient funds fees on a single transaction. The complaint also claims that the credit union fails to adequately disclose that there are situations when a consumer will be charged multiple out-of-network fees for a single transaction on an ATM that is not a Wright-Patt Credit Union ATM. (Qualls et al v. Wright-Patt Credit Union, Inc., Case No. 19-cv-1965, S. D. OH.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of banks, click here.
The Latest
Saffron USA
Unauthorized health claims come down in wake of FDA warning letter.
Pencils Down: Princeton Review Revises Marketing following TINA.org Investigation
SAT test prep company comes clean about its money-back guarantee.
Nutrafol Needs to Shed Its Deceptive Hair Growth Claims
Illegal claims that company’s products prevent hair loss also need to go.
Regulators Act on TINA.org’s Complaint Against Rihanna’s Savage X Fenty
MADISON, CONN. December 1, 2022 – Acting on a complaint filed by ad watchdog, truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org), California regulators have reached a settlement with lingerie company Savage X Fenty, originally a joint venture between…