There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
April 2019: The stay in the Begley case was lifted.
May 2018: A federal judge stayed the the Begley case. (doc 47 and 5-10-18 order)
2017: Two class-action lawsuits were filed regarding the marketing for WindsorONE and WindsorONE+ Protected trim boards. The complaints, which was originally filed in the summer and amended in the fall, claim that the trim was marketed as being free of defects, suitable for exterior use, and more durable than other similar products when, according to plaintiffs, the trim prematurely deteriorates, rots, and decays. Click on the case information below to read the complaints.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.