WEN® Cleansing Conditioners

August 2017: The Dalhaus case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.

June 2016: The Imig action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed.

January 2016: Two class-action lawsuits were filed against WEN by Chaz Dean and Guthy-Renker for allegedly deceptively marketing WEN® Cleansing Conditioners. According to the complaints, the companies market the conditioners as, among other things, “gentle enough to use every day” without adequately warning consumers of the risk of significant hair loss, damage, and other injuries. Click on the case information below to read the complaints.

• Dalhaus et al v. WEN by Chaz Dean, Inc., Guthy-Renker Ltd., and Guthy-Renker Partners, Inc., Case No. 16-cv-31, S. D. IL.
• Imig et al v. Guthy-Renker LLC and WEN by Chaz Dean Inc., Case No. 16-cv-169, E. D. CA.

For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding WEN hair products and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.