Rear-View Displays in Volvo Vehicles
Allegations: Marketing vehicles as safe when the rear-view camera display malfunctions and disappears
Volvo 850
March 2018: A federal judge granted the company’s motion to dismiss concluding, among other things, that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
May 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Volvo for advertising that its Volvo 850 had an innovative Side Impact Protection System (SIPS) with solid steel anti-intrusion doorbars on all four doors, when, according to the complaint, the SIPS did not exist in the rear doors. The class-action lawsuit was filed on behalf of those who have leased or owned the Volvo 850 produced in 1997. (Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint later in 2013.) (Webb et al. v. Volvo Cars of N.A., LLC et al., Case No. 13-cv-2394, E.D. Penn.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Volvo and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Volvo’s Android Automotive Operating System
Allegations: Marketing that the system provides a “user-friendly interface and unparalleled connectivity” when it freezes, reboots, crashes, and fails
Volvo XC90
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing Volvo’s Sensus as compatible with the Android Auto app when it’s not
Sensus System in Volvo XC90s
Volvo XC90 T8
Volvo’s Sensus
The Latest
Folgers: The Best Part of Wakin’ Up
The best wake up songs. The best cups of coffee. The best part of wakin’ up.
Broadway.com
Pulling back the curtain on this official-sounding website.
Wuffy and Other ‘AI’ Dogs
Can these “robot” puppies replace man’s best friend?
Ellipse by LegXercise (aka Ellipse One)
Can you actually work out without the work?
US Patent and Trademark Office Impersonator Reported to FTC
MADISON, CONN. Feb. 11, 2026 – A company calling itself “Patent & Trademark Office” is violating the FTC’s Impersonation Rule as well as the FTC Act by falsely posing as…