Smart Screen Lenses Draft
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products are capable of preventing and minimizing digital eyestrain caused by long periods of screen time
August 2017: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement.
January 2017: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement resolving two false advertising class-action lawsuits against Visionworks:
According to the settlement terms, class members may receive a full refund for a maximum award of $100 for each BOGO transaction. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for July 31, 2017.
June 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Visionworks of America for allegedly deceptively advertising that consumers who purchase one pair of eyeglasses get another pair free when, according to plaintiffs, the buy-one-get-one-free offer is continuously offered for a majority of the year and the ordinary price of the first pair of eyeglasses is increased making the second pair of eyeglasses not “truly free,” in violation of Illinois state law and FTC regulations. In September 2016, this action was transferred to a court in Ohio. (Lenart et al v. Visionworks of America, Inc., Case No. 16-cv-5935, N. D. OH.)
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products are capable of preventing and minimizing digital eyestrain caused by long periods of screen time
Allegations: Misrepresenting that it secures consumers’ personal data when it failed to do so and there was a data breach in October 2024
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.