Broadway.com
Pulling back the curtain on this official-sounding website.
In August 2013, a federal judge preliminarily approved a $23 million settlement to a class-action lawsuit filed against Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. for allegedly falsely advertising that Vioxx had greater benefits than the generic versions when these benefits had not been established. According to the settlement terms, class members may receive a cash award of up to $75 with proof of purchase. (In re: Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1657, E. D. LA.).
Pulling back the curtain on this official-sounding website.
Can these “robot” puppies replace man’s best friend?
Can you actually work out without the work?
MADISON, CONN. Feb. 11, 2026 – A company calling itself “Patent & Trademark Office” is violating the FTC’s Impersonation Rule as well as the FTC Act by falsely posing as…
Complaint to FTC cites violations of agency’s Impersonation Rule.