Decoding Cosmetics Claims: Non-Toxic
Without a strong legal definition for “non-toxic,” cosmetic companies are making it up as they go along.
March 2016: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
January 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Victoria Fine Foods for allegedly falsely marketing Victoria® Premium Vodka Sauce as being “All Natural” and containing “No Preservatives” when it actually contains citric acid, a non-natural, chemically processed ingredient and preservative. (Shmidt et al v. Victoria Fine Foods, LLC, Case No. 16-cv-230, E. D. NY.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding natural claims and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Without a strong legal definition for “non-toxic,” cosmetic companies are making it up as they go along.
Online beauty retailer blames Google for its own deceptive Google ad.
LuLaRoe’s founders on the hotseat in Washington’s pyramid case against the company.
Supplement company says product is not a “fertility supplement.” Its marketing says otherwise.
Laundry detergent’s “plant-based” claims come under scrutiny.