
NCPW 2025: Fighting against Deceptive Marketing
If you’ve been misled by an ad, regulators want to hear from you. We do too.
September 2016: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed.
October 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Dynamic Sports Nutrition for allegedly misrepresenting the nature and benefits of its bodybuilding dietary supplements, including Tren 75, Winn50, Test 600x, Clen, Var, and Decca 200. For example, the complaint alleges that the advertised benefits of Clen include fat loss and appetite control, and the advertised benefits of Deca 200 include strength, joint protection, and recovery when, in reality, these products do no provide such benefits. (Tiger et al v. Dynamic Sports Nutrition, LLC and PBB Trademark Holdings, LLC, Case No. 15-cv-1701, M. D. FL.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding bodybuilding supplements and TINA.org’s coverage of the products, click here.
If you’ve been misled by an ad, regulators want to hear from you. We do too.
It’s easier to rack up hidden fees than it is to cancel.
The only thing more “ridiculous” than the touted benefits is the cancellation process.
Under a proposed bill, theaters could be fined for making moviegoers guess.
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.