Jury Hands Down a Verdict in Prevagen Deceptive Marketing Case
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
In September 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against US-Mattress alleging that the company falsely advertises a “100 Night In-Home Trial” for mattresses to make consumers think that they have 100 days to try out and return a mattress if they are dissatisfied when, according to plaintiffs, the mattresses are non-returnable. (Wheeler et al v. Bedding Pros LLC d/b/a US-Mattress, Case No. 18-cv-1739, C.D. Cal.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding sleep products and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
Regulators have a beef with company’s climate pledge.
Consumers need to be wary of undisclosed incentivized reviews.
Why TINA.org supports FTC’s proposed changes to COPPA Rule but pushes for more.
FTC alleges company pressures consumers into overpaying for its tax filing software.