There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Deng et al. v. Kudos Innovations, Inc.
24-cv-10845, D. Mass.
(April 2024)
Ultimate Diaper
Falsely marketing the product as “the safest diaper for baby’s sensitive skin” and made of “plant-based materials” when testing shows that the diaper contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are harmful, synthetic chemicals
Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. as to the named plaintiffs’ claims and When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled. as to the class members’ claims
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.