Broadway.com
Pulling back the curtain on this official-sounding website.
In August 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Ulster Savings Bank for allegedly misleadingly representing that it only charges overdraft fees on a transaction if an account does not have enough money to cover it when, according to plaintiffs, the bank charges such fees on transactions that do not overdraw accounts. In addition, the complaint claims that the bank misleadingly represents that it only charges one fee on a single transaction when, according to plaintiffs, the bank charges another fee every time a transaction is reprocessed for payment. (Turner et al v. Ulster Savings Bank, Case No. 20-cv-6084, S.D.N.Y.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of banks, click here.
Pulling back the curtain on this official-sounding website.
Can these “robot” puppies replace man’s best friend?
Can you actually work out without the work?
MADISON, CONN. Feb. 11, 2026 – A company calling itself “Patent & Trademark Office” is violating the FTC’s Impersonation Rule as well as the FTC Act by falsely posing as…
Complaint to FTC cites violations of agency’s Impersonation Rule.