There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In April 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against The Tennis Channel for allegedly falsely advertising that the video-streaming service Tennis Channel Plus would provide subscribers access to “even more” and “exclusive” live tennis matches and tournaments without actually providing all of the content advertised. (Wilson et al v. The Tennis Channel, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-3473, C.D. Cal.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the streaming of sporting events and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.