
1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Herrick et al. v. TTE Technology, Inc. d/b/a TCL North America
25-cv-945, C.D. Cal.
(April 2025)
Mitchell et al. v. TTE Technology, Inc. d/b/a TCL North America
25-cv-6424, W.D.N.Y.
(Aug. 2025)
TCL QLED Televisions
Falsely advertising that products have QLED (quantum dot light-emitting diode) technology when they either do not have the technology or the technology is present in such a small amount that it does not provide the advertised benefits
Herrick case: Remanded back to state court
Mitchell case: Pending
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.