Jury Hands Down a Verdict in Prevagen Deceptive Marketing Case
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
In March 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Suffolk Federal Credit Union for allegedly falsely representing that customers are charged only one insufficient funds fee on a single transaction if their account does not have enough money to cover a transaction when, according to plaintiffs, the credit union routinely charges multiple fees on a single transaction. (Watson et al v. Suffolk Federal Credit Union, Case No. 20-cv-1531, E.D.N.Y.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of banks and credit unions, click here.
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
Regulators have a beef with company’s climate pledge.
Consumers need to be wary of undisclosed incentivized reviews.
Why TINA.org supports FTC’s proposed changes to COPPA Rule but pushes for more.
FTC alleges company pressures consumers into overpaying for its tax filing software.