What You Should Know about Used Cars and Open Recalls
It may surprise you.
Sue Bee and Aunt Sue’s Honey Products
July 2020: Summary judgment was entered in favor of Sioux Honey Association Cooperative.
April 2018: This stay of this case was lifted.
October 2017: This case was stayed pending the FDA’s decision regarding the proper use of the word “natural.”
January 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Sioux Honey Association Cooperative for allegedly deceptively marketing Sue Bee and Aunt Sue’s honey products as pure and natural when, in reality, they contain a synthetic chemical ingredient, glyphosate. (Tran et al v. Sioux Honey Association Cooperative, Case No. 17-cv-110, C.D. Cal.)
For more information about natural claims and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
The Latest
Jury Hands Down Verdict in Prevagen Deceptive Marketing Case
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
JBS: ‘Net Zero by 2040’
Regulators have a beef with company’s climate pledge.
Gift Card for a Five-Star Amazon Review
Consumers need to be wary of undisclosed incentivized reviews.
When Privacy Concerns and Deceptive Marketing Issues Intersect
Why TINA.org supports FTC’s proposed changes to COPPA Rule but pushes for more.