Starion Energy
April 2016: The named plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the dismissal of the lawsuit. March 2016: A federal judge granted the company’s motion to dismiss finding that the…
In May 2017, a state judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a class-action lawsuit against Starion Energy.
The January 2017 complaint alleges that the company offers low initial rates for electricity and a month-to-month variable rate that is tied to the company’s cost of electricity when, according to plaintiffs, Starion Energy charges an “extraordinarily high premium rate for electricity” that is not tied to the market price and, as a result, customers pay as much as five times the market rate.
According to the settlement agreement, class members may receive a cash award based on the amount of power they used and the amount they were charged. In addition, the company agreed to modify the contracts (e.g., to include a prominently-displayed provision stating that savings are not guaranteed).
A final fairness hearing is scheduled for November 13, 2017. For more information, go to http://www.variableelectricsettlement.com/.
(Gruber et al v. Starion Energy, Inc., Case No. CV-17-6075408, Superior Court of Connecticut – Judicial District of Hartford)
For more information about other class-action lawsuit filed against energy suppliers, click here.
April 2016: The named plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the dismissal of the lawsuit. March 2016: A federal judge granted the company’s motion to dismiss finding that the…
This risk-free trial might have you pulling your hair out.
Proposed new earnings claim rule comes three years after TINA.org comment to FTC.
How negative feelings surrounding menstruation have influenced period product marketing.
Why these products may leave you wanting more.
Class-action lawsuits target preservative-free claims.