With Personalized Pricing, Disclosure Is a Start, But Not a Finish Line
TINA.org and other consumer advocates file comment with FTC.
In October 2013, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Willis of Colorado Inc., Willis Ltd., Willis Group Holdings Ltd., Willis North America, Inc., and Amy S. Baranoucky regarding their allegedly fraudulent involvement with and marketing of Stanford Financial Group, a financial services company based in Houston, Texas that was seized by U.S. authorities in 2009 because of charges of fraud.
With respect to the deceptive advertising allegations, the 90-page complaint claims that Stanford Financial misled Mexican and Venezuelan investors in a number of ways. Specifically, Stanford Financial allegedly misled investors into believing that investments in “SIB” Certificates of Deposits (CDs) were (1) safe and sound because SIB was part of the Stanford Financial Group based in Houston and therefore subject to U.S. government regulation; and (2) even safer than U.S. bank-issued CDs because Stanford Financial had unique Lloyds of London insurance policies in place that went above and beyond FDIC insurance. In reality, however, SIB was an Antiguan offshore bank, and Stanford Financial was operating a massive Ponzi scheme that collected billions of dollars from investors, according to the complaint.
The plaintiffs claim that the Willis defendants helped Stanford Financial with this false and deceptive marketing, among other things. (Janvey, et al. v. Willis of Colorado Inc., 13-cv-03980, N.D. Tex.)
TINA.org and other consumer advocates file comment with FTC.
New book explores why MLMs are often associated with harmful outcomes – and what can be done about it.
You don’t need to fake your own death to feel love.
Marketing and reality are not in sync.
New study opens the floodgates to class-action litigation.