1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
| Case Names (Date) |
Foster et al v. Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. 21-cv-360, S.D. Ind. (Feb. 2021) Williams et al v. Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Product/Service | Sportsmix and several other pet foods |
| Allegations | Falsely marketing pet foods as suitable for and providing nutrition to animals when they contain dangerous amounts of the toxin aflatoxin |
| Status | Pending |
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.