The FTC is not anti-direct selling. It’s pro-truth in advertising.
The DSA misses the mark.
Spindrift Sparkling Water and Spiked Sparkling Water
Case Name (Date)
Pantoni et al. v. Spindrift Beverage Co.
23-cv-14, N.D. Cal.
(Jan. 2023)
Product/Service
Spindrift Sparkling Water and Spindrift Spiked Sparkling Water
Allegations
Falsely marketing that products contain only real fruit along with sparkling water or spiked sparkling water when they also contain a synthetic flavoring ingredient and preservative (citric acid)
Status
Pending
The Latest
Ocean Spray Cranberry Juice Blend
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Lens.com
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
On Shoes
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Junk Fees at JFK, LaGuardia and Newark Airports
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?