Class Action

Spindrift Sparkling Water and Spiked Sparkling Water

Class Action

Spindrift Sparkling Water and Spiked Sparkling Water


Case Name (Date)

Pantoni et al. v. Spindrift Beverage Co.
23-cv-14, N.D. Cal.
(Jan. 2023)


Product/Service

Spindrift Sparkling Water and Spindrift Spiked Sparkling Water


Allegations

Falsely marketing that products contain only real fruit along with sparkling water or spiked sparkling water when they also contain a synthetic flavoring ingredient and preservative (citric acid)


Status

Pending



The Latest

Filters

Quietum Plus

Ad Alert

Quietum Plus

TINA.org finds several issues with marketing of purported tinnitus supplement.

Bumbu Rum

Ad Alert

Bumbu Rum

Lawsuit alleges beverage doesn’t meet federal standards to be marketed as rum.


Show More