South State Bank
In May 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against South State Bank for allegedly misleadingly representing that it charges only one overdraft and non-sufficient funds fee on a single transaction when an account does not have enough money in it to cover the transaction when, according to the complaint, the bank charges such fees on transactions that do not overdraw an account and routinely charges multiple fees on a single transaction. (Austin et al v. South State Bank, Case No. 20-cv-1993, D.S.C.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of banks, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
NJ tax dollars spent on ‘Blue Ribbon’ school awards that critics call deceptive
Julie O’Connor, Nj Spotlight News
The Regulatory Loopholes Behind Prevagen’s Rise
Sara Talpos, Med Shadow
CATrends: Tequilas Marketed as 100% Agave
Ingredient claims come into the limelight.
Jimmy Dean Breakfast Burritos
Beware of food images wrapped in deception.
The FTC is not anti-direct selling. It’s pro-truth in advertising.
The DSA misses the mark.