Keto Fat Bomb
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the product as having “Zero Added Sugar”
SlimFast Meal Replacement Products
| Case Name (Date) |
Kuciver et al v. KSF Acquisition Corp. 21-cv-5964, N.D. Ill. (Nov. 2021) |
|---|---|
| Product/Service | SlimFast meal replacement products, including shakes, bars, and snacks |
| Allegations | Misleadingly marketing products as clinically proven to provide weight loss and hunger control benefits without adequate scientific evidence to support such claims |
| Status | Pending |
Class-Action Tracker
SlimFast Meal Replacement Products
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products are “clinically proven” to help consumers “lose weight & keep it off” when scientific evidence does not support such claims
The Latest
SlimFast’s ‘Clinically Proven’ Weight-Loss Claims
Recent inquiry takes aim at company’s “clinically proven” weight-loss claims, with a somewhat surprising result.
Ad or Not? Slim Fast in Star Magazine
NAD decision takes aim at advertising “formatted as editorial content.”