Keto Fat Bomb
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the product as having “Zero Added Sugar”
SlimFast Meal Replacement Products
Case Name (Date)
Kuciver et al v. KSF Acquisition Corp.
21-cv-5964, N.D. Ill.
(Nov. 2021)
Product/Service
SlimFast meal replacement products, including shakes, bars, and snacks
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing products as clinically proven to provide weight loss and hunger control benefits without adequate scientific evidence to support such claims
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
SlimFast Meal Replacements
Allegations: Falsely advertising that products are “clinically proven” to cause and maintain weight loss without having scientific evidence to support such claims
SlimFast Smoothie and Shake Mixes
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that products contain more protein than they actually do
SlimFast Meal Replacement Products
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products are “clinically proven” to help consumers “lose weight & keep it off” when scientific evidence does not support such claims
The Latest
CATrends: False and Misleading Protein Claims
Brands named in litigation include SlimFast, Silk and Beyond Meat, among others.
SlimFast’s ‘Clinically Proven’ Weight-Loss Claims
Recent inquiry takes aim at company’s “clinically proven” weight-loss claims, with a somewhat surprising result.
Ad or Not? Slim Fast in Star Magazine
NAD decision takes aim at advertising “formatted as editorial content.”