There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Plowden et al. v. Similasan Corp.
23-cv-2511, D. Colo.
(Sept. 2023)
Similasan Eye Relief products
Marketing products as able to relieve various eye issues – including watery eyes, grittiness, redness, strain, and burning – when the company does not have FDA approval to make such drug claims and has not shown that the products are “generally recognized as safe and effective”
Settled
(Final approval granted)
https://www.homeopathiceyedropsettlement.com/home
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.