
1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Michael et al. v. Nutrishus Brands, Inc.
22-cv-8746, C.D. Cal.
(Dec. 2022)
RxSugar organic liquid sugar, organic maple syrup, and organic chocolate syrup
Falsely advertising products as “0 Calories” and “0 Net Carbs” when they do not meet the FDA’s requirements to bear such claims
Falsely advertising products as “0 Glycemic” when the composition of them does not result in a zero glycemic index
Falsely marketing products as “safe for diabetes” when they likely cause increases in blood sugar levels and there’s no evidence they prevent spikes in blood sugar
Pending
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.