TINA.org Tells DOT: Don’t Muddy Airline Pricing
A proposed rule change could make it harder to know what you’ll actually pay for a flight.
Simijanovic et al. v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V.
23-cv-12882, E.D. Mich.
(Nov. 2023)
Flights on Royal Dutch Airlines
Using misleading and outdated facts and figures about its environmental initiatives in marketing materials
Misleadingly representing that the airline is “[f]lying on biofuel” that is sustainable when almost all of the fuel it uses is fossil fuel
Misleadingly marketing that consumers who purchase carbon credits in its CO2ZERO program (a reforestation program that involves planting trees and sustainable fuels) offset the environmental impact of flying when purchasing carbon credits does not actually negate the effects flying has on the environment
Dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.
A proposed rule change could make it harder to know what you’ll actually pay for a flight.
Corporate bullies are weaponizing the legal system to silence the truth.
TINA.org unwraps the hidden cost of these gift boxes.
Following lawsuit, Texas AG launches probe into energy drink’s “youth-oriented branding strategies.”
What you need to know about this shady e-commerce site.