TINA.org Joins Consumer Advocates to Keep FTC Bipartisan
Why agency independence is in the best interests of consumers.
Cave et al. v. Rowdy Beverage, Inc.
24-cv-58, M.D. Fla.
(Jan. 2024)
Lake et al. v. Rowdy Beverage, Inc.
23-cv-6114, N.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2023)
Rowdy energy drinks
Falsely marketing that drinks contain “No Preservatives” when they contain at least two (citric acid and ascorbic acid)
Cave case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Lake case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Why agency independence is in the best interests of consumers.
What exactly does this running brand mean by “your return is on us”?
Be wary of “natural” claims.
Lawsuits throw the red flag on a number of DFS platforms.
This is not a sitewide perk.